Actor Inamulhaq Responds to Viral Music Video Controversy Linked to Radhika Yadav Murder Case

Bollywood actor Inamulhaq, known for his roles in acclaimed films, has spoken out amid the controversy surrounding a viral music video featuring him and Radhika Yadav—one of the accused in the recent high-profile murder of a TikTok influencer. The actor has now clarified his stand after the video resurfaced online, drawing unexpected attention and public speculation.

Music Video Goes Viral Amid Ongoing Case
A music video titled Laute Nahi, shot months ago, recently went viral as social media users connected it to the murder case involving Radhika Yadav and her boyfriend. The couple is accused of killing a 22-year-old social media influencer from Madhya Pradesh. The timing of the video’s resurgence raised eyebrows, as many mistook it for a recent collaboration.

Inamulhaq Clears the Air
Responding to the online buzz, Inamulhaq clarified that the video was filmed long before the crime came to light. He stated that as an artist, he was unaware of Radhika’s personal life or any legal matters surrounding her. The actor stressed that the resurfacing of the video is purely coincidental and has no connection to the ongoing investigation.

No Social Media Presence, Claims Actor
Inamulhaq also pointed out that Radhika had no public presence on social media at the time of the shoot, making it impossible for him or the production team to know about any controversial background. He emphasized that the collaboration was purely professional, and nothing beyond that should be assumed.

Public Sentiment and Online Reaction
The video’s circulation on platforms like Instagram and YouTube has led to mixed reactions. While some users questioned the timing, others expressed concern about sensationalizing the case by dragging unrelated people into the narrative. This situation once again highlights how digital content can be misinterpreted when real-life incidents gain national attention.

Impact on Artists and Caution in the Industry
This incident underlines a growing challenge in the digital era—how past professional work can unexpectedly be linked to criminal cases or controversies. It raises a broader conversation in the entertainment industry about due diligence and the reputational risks of digital associations, especially in Tier 2 cities where public opinion often travels quickly through social media.

Conclusion:
Inamulhaq’s clarification serves as a reminder to separate professional associations from personal actions, especially in sensitive cases. As the investigation continues, it becomes crucial to avoid jumping to conclusions and ensure that facts are not overshadowed by viral narratives.

Ask ChatGPT