
Former White House trade adviser Peter Navarro has once again targeted India for its energy ties with Russia, accusing New Delhi of using US dollars to buy Russian oil. Referring to the practice as a “laundromat” for Moscow, Navarro argued that such deals indirectly weaken Western sanctions imposed after the Ukraine conflict. His comments have sparked debate about India’s balancing act in securing affordable energy while navigating global geopolitical pressures.
India has repeatedly defended its decision to purchase Russian oil, highlighting that its choices are guided by national interests and the need to ensure affordable energy for its citizens. Officials point out that global energy markets have been volatile, and countries like India, with high energy demands, must prioritise domestic stability over external criticism.
For cities beyond metros, where rising fuel prices directly affect transport, agriculture, and daily living costs, cheaper Russian crude has offered some relief. Local businesses and transport operators often argue that without these price controls, inflationary pressure would have been much higher. This perspective makes the issue not just about foreign policy but about everyday economics for ordinary Indians.
Global analysts note that the criticism from US figures like Navarro reflects Washington’s frustration at countries choosing independent paths. However, India’s position as a fast-growing economy means it cannot afford prolonged energy shocks. Maintaining multiple suppliers, including Russia, is seen as a practical strategy rather than a political endorsement.
As the geopolitical debate continues, India remains firm that its energy policy is shaped by national priorities. For common people in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities, what matters most is whether fuel remains affordable, a reminder that global politics often has its sharpest impact on local lives.