Dale Steyn Questions India’s Intent in Rejecting Ben Stokes’ Draw Offer: “It Was For Personal Gain”

India’s recent Test win against England may have earned applause at home, but it’s also sparked a fresh wave of scrutiny—this time from former South African pacer Dale Steyn. The retired cricketer raised eyebrows by suggesting that India’s refusal to accept Ben Stokes’ draw offer wasn’t about the spirit of the game but more about personal milestones.

During the fifth and final Test at Dharamshala, England’s skipper Ben Stokes had reportedly offered a draw due to bad light and fading chances of a result. India, however, chose to play on—and eventually secured a comfortable win. Steyn, weighing in on this, questioned whether the continuation of play was truly necessary or simply served individual interests.

He didn’t point fingers at any one player but made it clear that the decision looked “more for someone’s personal gain than the team’s cause.” His comment has since sparked a debate online, especially among fans and former players split between applauding India’s determination and questioning the ethics behind the decision.

In Indian cricket circles, such criticism isn’t new. But what makes this one stick is the fact that it touches on an uncomfortable truth—how much of what we watch is driven by stats and records? The Test series was already sealed 3-1 in India’s favour before the final match. So, Steyn’s observation raises a valid point: was the continuation necessary when both the result and the series had already been decided?

While Indian cricket fans from cities like Nagpur, Indore, and Ranchi took to social media in defense of the team’s spirit and will to win, some did admit they were left wondering if Steyn had a point. In smaller cities, where the love for cricket often borders on devotion, these debates tend to get personal—and emotional.

This isn’t the first time international voices have commented on India’s on-field decisions, but coming from a respected player like Steyn, it hits differently. His words act as a reminder that even celebrated wins can—and should—invite tough questions.