Indian Techie Accused of Working Multiple Jobs in US—But CEOs Still Call Him “Brilliant”

Soham Parekh, an Indian tech professional based in the US, has become the centre of a growing online debate after multiple startup CEOs accused him of moonlighting—working for several companies simultaneously without disclosure. What’s surprising, however, is the tone of the accusations. Despite raising concerns, several employers also praised his skills, calling him “smart” and “efficient,” making the case more intriguing than typical HR violations.

What Happened?
At least five US-based startup founders came forward, claiming that Soham Parekh was on their payroll while also working with other firms during the same period. Some even alleged that he used AI tools to respond during meetings or submit updates, creating an illusion of active participation across jobs.

This incident has reignited conversations about moonlighting in tech—especially among remote workers and digital nomads post-COVID.

Mixed Reactions from Employers
Unlike traditional firing cases, this one has a twist. Though the CEOs highlighted ethical concerns and breach of trust, many couldn’t help but admire Soham’s sharpness and productivity. One said, “He was one of our most efficient engineers… until we realised he was also working elsewhere.”

The reactions raise an important question: if performance isn’t compromised, should moonlighting be outright condemned?

Indian Context: Familiar but Unspoken
For many Indian professionals, especially those from Tier 2 cities venturing into global tech roles, this story feels familiar. Moonlighting has long existed quietly in India—particularly among freelancers and developers juggling multiple gigs to meet financial goals.

However, as companies adopt global HR standards and remote culture becomes mainstream, clear policies and mutual trust are becoming more important than ever.

Social Media Divided
On platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and LinkedIn, reactions are sharply divided. Some users admire Soham for managing multiple roles so smoothly, calling it a “smart hustle.” Others argue that it’s unethical and undermines company-client relationships.

For young techies in India, it has sparked curiosity—where does ambition end, and dishonesty begin?

Legal and Ethical Implications
While moonlighting is not outright illegal in most countries, failing to disclose it—especially in full-time roles with exclusivity clauses—can have legal consequences. Companies now face the challenge of balancing flexibility with accountability, and employees must weigh short-term benefits against long-term career risks.

Conclusion:
Soham Parekh’s case sits at the intersection of ethics, ambition, and evolving work culture. As remote jobs blur boundaries and redefine productivity, it’s clear that both employers and professionals need more transparency and updated norms. For India’s aspiring tech workforce, especially from Tier 2 cities aiming to go global, this is a reminder: smart work is good—but trust still matters.