Pahlaj Nihalani Reacts to Vivek Oberoi’s Comment, Recalls Past Controversies

Former CBFC chief Pahlaj Nihalani has once again found himself in the headlines, this time for his sharp response to actor Vivek Oberoi’s recent remark. The exchange has revived discussions around past controversies in the film industry, particularly the heated debates that surrounded movies like Udta Punjab. Nihalani, known for his outspoken nature, did not hold back while questioning Oberoi’s relevance in the current Bollywood landscape.

The comment came after Vivek Oberoi’s statement about the functioning of the censor board and his criticism of the challenges faced by filmmakers in bringing stories to the big screen. Nihalani countered by suggesting that Oberoi should reflect on his own filmography, even asking whether the actor is getting films at all. This blunt response has sparked debate online, with people divided on whether Nihalani’s words were fair or unnecessarily personal.

Industry insiders point out that conflicts between filmmakers, actors, and the censor board are not new. The Udta Punjab controversy remains one of the most discussed cases where censorship and creative freedom clashed. Nihalani’s tenure as CBFC chief was marked by several such debates, often positioning him at the center of arguments about morality, art, and audience sensibilities.

For audiences in Tier 2 cities, where Bollywood films often carry a mix of entertainment and moral messaging, such controversies underline the tension between creative storytelling and censorship. Many viewers still recall films being delayed or altered due to board objections, which directly shaped their cinema-going experience.

In conclusion, while Vivek Oberoi’s comment has reignited an old debate, Pahlaj Nihalani’s reaction shows how past controversies continue to influence discussions about censorship and artistic freedom in Indian cinema. The clash between creative expression and regulatory control remains a recurring theme, and this latest exchange only highlights how unresolved those tensions still are.