PETA India Slams SC’s Stray Dog Removal Order as ‘Unconstitutional’

PETA India has strongly opposed the recent Supreme Court order directing the removal of stray dogs from public spaces. The organisation called the directive “impractical, illogical, and illegal”, arguing that it goes against established animal welfare laws and the Constitution’s commitment to compassion for all living beings. The move has sparked a fresh debate on how India should address human-animal conflicts.

Animal rights activists believe the order could lead to large-scale cruelty towards stray dogs. They emphasise that the solution lies in scientific methods such as animal birth control (ABC) and vaccination drives, not mass removal. According to them, removing dogs from their territories often causes disruption, leading to more aggressive behaviour and new dogs entering the area.

PETA India has also raised concerns about the feasibility of implementing the order in a country with millions of stray dogs. The organisation argues that civic bodies are already stretched for resources, and relocation without proper facilities would likely result in suffering for the animals.

Supporters of the removal order, however, highlight increasing dog-bite incidents, especially in urban and semi-urban areas. They argue that public safety must take priority, and stricter action is needed to prevent attacks, particularly on children and the elderly.

The debate underscores the growing tension between ensuring public safety and protecting animal rights. With both sides holding strong views, the challenge for policymakers is to find a humane, effective, and lawful solution that addresses the concerns of citizens while respecting the rights of animals.

Do you want me to now also prepare the headline and intro in a more catchy, share-worthy style so it pulls more clicks for your Orange City Times audience? That way it’s still factual but reader-grabbing