Sanjay Dutt Reveals How He Handled a Fan’s Rs 72 Crore Gift After Her Death

In a surprising revelation, Sanjay Dutt shared that a female fan once left him property worth Rs 72 crore in her will before she passed away. The actor, known for his candid nature, recently opened up about the unexpected gesture and how he chose to deal with the massive inheritance that came with it.

A Fan’s Final Wish

Sanjay Dutt said the incident took place years ago, when he received legal notice informing him that a woman had left behind property in his name. He didn’t know her personally, but she was reportedly a devoted fan who admired his work deeply. The assets included land, property papers, and jewellery—together valued at around Rs 72 crore.

Dutt admitted he was shocked. “I had never met her. She did all this purely out of admiration,” he explained.

What Sanjay Dutt Did Next

Instead of accepting the inheritance, Sanjay Dutt made a choice that spoke volumes about his principles. He immediately returned everything to her family, ensuring her relatives retained full rights over the assets. “I didn’t feel right taking something that belonged to her family,” he said.

The actor also made it clear that he believes such gestures, while touching, should be respected with the right intent. For him, it wasn’t about the money, but about doing what felt morally correct.

Fans React to the Gesture

Dutt’s decision has been appreciated widely online. Many fans in cities like Nagpur, Indore, and Surat praised him for his grounded response. “This is what real stars are made of,” one social media user commented.

In an industry often criticised for extravagance, such moments of humility resonate strongly, especially in Tier 2 cities where admiration for Bollywood stars is deeply rooted but also values-driven.

Conclusion

Sanjay Dutt’s honest and respectful handling of an extraordinary fan gesture highlights the fine balance between celebrity status and personal ethics. By choosing to return a massive inheritance, he reminded his fans—and the industry—that some decisions are about conscience, not currency.